<?xml version="1.0" encoding="UTF-8"?><rss version="2.0"
	xmlns:content="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/content/"
	xmlns:dc="http://purl.org/dc/elements/1.1/"
	xmlns:atom="http://www.w3.org/2005/Atom"
	xmlns:sy="http://purl.org/rss/1.0/modules/syndication/"
		>
<channel>
	<title>Comments on: Apple and the word &#8220;podcasting&#8221;</title>
	<atom:link href="http://davesmidlife.com/2006/09/24/apple-and-the-word-podcasting/feed/" rel="self" type="application/rss+xml" />
	<link>http://davesmidlife.com/2006/09/24/apple-and-the-word-podcasting/</link>
	<description>A middle-aged baseball fan waiting to see what he&#039;ll be when he grows up</description>
	<lastBuildDate>Sat, 10 Dec 2011 04:31:07 +0000</lastBuildDate>
	<generator>http://wordpress.org/?v=2.9.2</generator>
	<sy:updatePeriod>hourly</sy:updatePeriod>
	<sy:updateFrequency>1</sy:updateFrequency>
		<item>
		<title>By: Chris Hughes</title>
		<link>http://davesmidlife.com/2006/09/24/apple-and-the-word-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-687</link>
		<dc:creator>Chris Hughes</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Tue, 26 Sep 2006 16:20:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davesmidlife.com/2006/09/24/apple-and-the-word-podcasting/#comment-687</guid>
		<description>Having read the letter itself, (http://blog.wired.com/music/index.blog?entry_id=1562695) I find it a little hard to see what all the fuss is about. If someone started a business in competition with PodcastReady, called, say, PodcastReadier and tried to trademark it, PodcastReady might have something to say about it. (Try saying that fast) Also, to quote the letter: &quot;Apple, of course, has no general objection to proper use of the descriptive term &#039;podcast&#039; as part of a trademark for goods and services offered in the podcasting field&quot;</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Having read the letter itself, (<a href="http://blog.wired.com/music/index.blog?entry_id=1562695" rel="nofollow">http://blog.wired.com/music/index.blog?entry_id=1562695</a>) I find it a little hard to see what all the fuss is about. If someone started a business in competition with PodcastReady, called, say, PodcastReadier and tried to trademark it, PodcastReady might have something to say about it. (Try saying that fast) Also, to quote the letter: &#8220;Apple, of course, has no general objection to proper use of the descriptive term &#8216;podcast&#8217; as part of a trademark for goods and services offered in the podcasting field&#8221;</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: wvh</title>
		<link>http://davesmidlife.com/2006/09/24/apple-and-the-word-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-682</link>
		<dc:creator>wvh</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Mon, 25 Sep 2006 20:15:47 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davesmidlife.com/2006/09/24/apple-and-the-word-podcasting/#comment-682</guid>
		<description>Hi Dave,

If you have been an Apple fan for 20 years (as I have been, too) I&#039;m kind of surprised that this is the first Apple legal story to really upset you. They&#039;ve done plenty of contempt-worthy stuff in the past, including threatening the guy behind the Apple rumors site Think Secret.

It&#039;s a damned shame that Apple legal acts the way they do, but Apple as a whole is still a fine company, especially compared to the alternatives. On some level I have to blame the state of intellectual property law in the USA; it&#039;s not conducive to being successful and kind at the same time.</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Hi Dave,</p>
<p>If you have been an Apple fan for 20 years (as I have been, too) I&#8217;m kind of surprised that this is the first Apple legal story to really upset you. They&#8217;ve done plenty of contempt-worthy stuff in the past, including threatening the guy behind the Apple rumors site Think Secret.</p>
<p>It&#8217;s a damned shame that Apple legal acts the way they do, but Apple as a whole is still a fine company, especially compared to the alternatives. On some level I have to blame the state of intellectual property law in the USA; it&#8217;s not conducive to being successful and kind at the same time.</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
	<item>
		<title>By: Smaran</title>
		<link>http://davesmidlife.com/2006/09/24/apple-and-the-word-podcasting/comment-page-1/#comment-681</link>
		<dc:creator>Smaran</dc:creator>
		<pubDate>Sun, 24 Sep 2006 11:53:51 +0000</pubDate>
		<guid isPermaLink="false">http://davesmidlife.com/2006/09/24/apple-and-the-word-podcasting/#comment-681</guid>
		<description>Dave, I did not know about this! It&#039;s outrageous. I too, as you know am a loyal Apple customer and fan. I think they need to take their legal team out back and fire them. Apple has always been &#039;the good guy&#039; and Microsoft the bad.  hate to see Apple join the bully club. Dave, I&#039;m sporting the Wired story you linked to as my current no. 1 on &lt;a href=&quot;http://digg.com/users/koregaonpark&quot; rel=&quot;nofollow&quot;&gt;my Digg profile&lt;/a&gt;. My friends and friends&#039; friends will surely find out about this.

Glad to see you blogging again!</description>
		<content:encoded><![CDATA[<p>Dave, I did not know about this! It&#8217;s outrageous. I too, as you know am a loyal Apple customer and fan. I think they need to take their legal team out back and fire them. Apple has always been &#8216;the good guy&#8217; and Microsoft the bad.  hate to see Apple join the bully club. Dave, I&#8217;m sporting the Wired story you linked to as my current no. 1 on <a href="http://digg.com/users/koregaonpark" rel="nofollow">my Digg profile</a>. My friends and friends&#8217; friends will surely find out about this.</p>
<p>Glad to see you blogging again!</p>
]]></content:encoded>
	</item>
</channel>
</rss>

